vrijdag, maart 07, 2008

Today, over an innocent friday lunch of porridge and pickles, Eunice and i settled for a conversation peppered with profound questions and rhetorics.

And it got me thinking the entire afternoon.

So for all kaypohs of the world, if you really wanna know, we unabashedly talked (and obsessed) about the current loves of our lives.

We also didn't spare the past either.

I used to think that once you got over someone, as in really move on, completely in love with the one you're with now, whenever the ex gets mentioned or just casually rolled off the tongue, you shouldn't feel a single bit of pang.

But what if that distance is bridged and an ex comes charging towards you with love and adoration you once craved so much - what happens next?

Do all possibilities of and ex and an ex reconciling get curtailed just because they stopped contacting one another?

Do you really love the one you're with just because you can't be with the one you really love?

Do marriages get annulled because most people don't realize that the past is way bigger than they think it is?



Told you it was profound.


It got worse when i came home and saw some pictures.
I wanted to prove myself wrong, that the past is the really in the past.

But I ended up with more questions that answers.


But one thing i do know - loving the one you're with doesn't mean that you can't love the one you really wanna love, but rather, the one you're with made you forget about the past.

Isn't that how the institution of marriages came about?

But that's an entirely different topic for another day.


Goodbye now, we're gonna try to drown our woeful asses in plenty of casino chips.

i think its 5:36 p.m. now

0comments